
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · CBK 1.4 · KVM 1.3 · 2.7 total
Expected goals are close (1.4 vs 1.3) — the model reads this as an evenly matched attack-defence balance.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for CBK's win chance, the blue ones for KVM's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| CBK goals | KVM 0 | KVM 1 | KVM 2 | KVM 3 | KVM 4 | KVM 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBK 0 | 8% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| CBK 1 | 9% | 13% | 8% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| CBK 2 | 7% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| CBK 3 | 3% | 4% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| CBK 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| CBK 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
CBK 38.2% · Draw 27.6% · KVM 34.2%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.5%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Neither team separates themselves here — 38% for the slight favourite, 28% for the draw.
The draw at 28% is the single most likely outcome — scoreline distribution keeps returning to 1-1.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
CBK
3-4-2-1Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
CBK scores +0.07 more per 90
KVM concedes 0.22 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
KVM sit 5 places higher in the table
Photo: V&A Dudush, CC BY 3.0