
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · WAA 1.0 · KGE 1.3 · 2.3 total
KGE's attack (1.10x the league average) against WAA's defence (1.00x, about the league average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.3.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for WAA's win chance, the blue ones for KGE's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| WAA goals | KGE 0 | KGE 1 | KGE 2 | KGE 3 | KGE 4 | KGE 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAA 0 | 10% | 12% | 9% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
| WAA 1 | 9% | 14% | 9% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
| WAA 2 | 5% | 6% | 4% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| WAA 3 | 2% | 2% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| WAA 4 | <1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| WAA 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
WAA 26.8% · Draw 29.1% · KGE 44.1%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.3%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
KAA Gent have the edge at 44% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
KAA Gent are favoured but the draw at 29% is too high to ignore — this doesn't feel like a walkover.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
WAA
4-2-3-1Predicted line-up
Cruciate Ligament Injury · Expected back 10 Jun
Refreshed about every 30 minutes. Return dates are estimates.
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
KGE scores +0.61 more per 90
KGE concedes 1.59 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
KGE sit 12 places higher in the table