
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Expected goals · NAG 1.6 · AVF 1.0 · 2.6 total
NAG's attack (0.83x, below the league average) against AVF's defence (1.24x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.6.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for NAG's win chance, the blue ones for AVF's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| NAG goals | AVF 0 | AVF 1 | AVF 2 | AVF 3 | AVF 4 | AVF 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAG 0 | 8% | 7% | 4% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| NAG 1 | 11% | 13% | 6% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| NAG 2 | 9% | 10% | 5% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| NAG 3 | 5% | 5% | 3% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| NAG 4 | 2% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| NAG 5 | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
NAG 50.4% · Draw 26.3% · AVF 23.2%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.7%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Nagoya Grampus edge this at 50% — expected goals of 1.6 to 1.0 give them the lean.
Single-goal margins account for 38% of outcomes — 1-1 at 13% is the model's best guess.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
NAG
3-4-2-1AVF
3-4-2-1Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
how each side performs at their ground
NAG scores +0.09 more per 90
NAG concedes 0.18 fewer per 90
Photo: Waka777, CC0 1.0