
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · SHI 1.3 · URA 1.5 · 2.8 total
URA's attack (1.05x the league average) against SHI's defence (1.15x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.2.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for SHI's win chance, the blue ones for URA's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| SHI goals | URA 0 | URA 1 | URA 2 | URA 3 | URA 4 | URA 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHI 0 | 7% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
| SHI 1 | 7% | 13% | 9% | 4% | 2% | 1% |
| SHI 2 | 5% | 8% | 6% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| SHI 3 | 2% | 3% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| SHI 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| SHI 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
SHI 31.4% · Draw 26.7% · URA 41.9%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.6%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Urawa Red Diamonds have the edge at 42% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
BTTS at 57% suggests both attacks will find the net — 1-1 at 13% sits at the top of the scoreline distribution.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
SHI
4-3-3URA
4-3-3Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
how each side performs at their ground
URA scores +0.91 more per 90
SHI concedes 0.31 fewer per 90