
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · PET 1.4 · CAM 1.2 · 2.6 total
PET's attack (0.88x, below the league average) against CAM's defence (1.04x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.2.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for PET's win chance, the blue ones for CAM's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| PET goals | CAM 0 | CAM 1 | CAM 2 | CAM 3 | CAM 4 | CAM 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET 0 | 8% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| PET 1 | 9% | 13% | 8% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| PET 2 | 7% | 9% | 5% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| PET 3 | 3% | 4% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| PET 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| PET 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
PET 39.5% · Draw 27.7% · CAM 32.8%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.5%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
This looks even — 28% draw probability with neither side above 40%.
The draw at 28% is the single most likely outcome — scoreline distribution keeps returning to 1-1.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
PET
4-2-3-1CAM
4-2-3-1Predicted line-up
Unknown · Expected back 30 Nov
Unknown · Expected back 30 Nov
Unknown · Expected back 30 Nov
No absences reported.
Refreshed about every 30 minutes. Return dates are estimates.
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
CAM scores +0.32 more per 90
CAM concedes 0.16 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
CAM sit 12 places higher in the table
Photo: Rodney Burton, CC BY-SA 2.0