
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · WIM 1.2 · BAR 1.0 · 2.2 total
WIM's attack (0.73x, below the league average) against BAR's defence (1.05x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.2.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for WIM's win chance, the blue ones for BAR's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| WIM goals | BAR 0 | BAR 1 | BAR 2 | BAR 3 | BAR 4 | BAR 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIM 0 | 13% | 11% | 6% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| WIM 1 | 13% | 14% | 7% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| WIM 2 | 8% | 8% | 4% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| WIM 3 | 3% | 3% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| WIM 4 | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| WIM 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
WIM 39.2% · Draw 31.0% · BAR 29.7%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.2%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
The draw at 31% is the most likely single outcome — neither side is above 39%.
Over 2.5 probability at 36% suggests goals but no clear winner — this looks like a 1-1 kind of night.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
WIM
5-4-1BAR
4-2-3-1Predicted line-up
No absences reported.
No absences reported.
Refreshed about every 30 minutes. Return dates are estimates.
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
BAR scores +0.19 more per 90
WIM concedes 0.24 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
WIM sit 6 places higher in the table
Photo: Johnlp, CC BY-SA 4.0