
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Expected goals · REA 2.6 · BRO 1.0 · 3.6 total
REA's attack (1.24x the league average) against BRO's defence (1.39x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 1.6.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for REA's win chance, the blue ones for BRO's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| REA goals | BRO 0 | BRO 1 | BRO 2 | BRO 3 | BRO 4 | BRO 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REA 0 | 3% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| REA 1 | 6% | 7% | 4% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| REA 2 | 9% | 9% | 5% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| REA 3 | 8% | 8% | 4% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| REA 4 | 5% | 5% | 3% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| REA 5 | 3% | 3% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
REA 70.7% · Draw 17.0% · BRO 12.3%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (4.9%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Reading should control this — 71% win probability and 1.7 goals per game say the edge is clear.
Bromley concede 2.1 per game on the model's weighted record, and Reading's most likely scoreline is 2-1 at 9%.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
REA
4-2-3-1BRO
4-1-4-1Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
REA scores +0.50 more per 90
REA concedes 0.92 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
REA sit 17 places higher in the table