
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · RST 1.4 · PAU 1.6 · 3.0 total
PAU's attack (1.19x the league average) against RST's defence (1.18x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.2.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for RST's win chance, the blue ones for PAU's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| RST goals | PAU 0 | PAU 1 | PAU 2 | PAU 3 | PAU 4 | PAU 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RST 0 | 5% | 7% | 6% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
| RST 1 | 6% | 12% | 9% | 5% | 2% | 1% |
| RST 2 | 5% | 8% | 6% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| RST 3 | 2% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| RST 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| RST 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
RST 32.2% · Draw 25.3% · PAU 42.6%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (1.0%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Pau have the edge at 43% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
Single-goal margins account for 38% of outcomes — 1-1 at 12% is the model's best guess.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
RST
4-2-3-1PAU
5-3-2Predicted line-up
No absences reported.
No absences reported.
Refreshed about every 30 minutes. Return dates are estimates.
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
PAU scores +0.08 more per 90
RST concedes 0.20 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
PAU sit 3 places higher in the table