
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · NAN 1.4 · GRE 1.0 · 2.4 total
NAN's attack (0.88x, below the league average) against GRE's defence (1.13x, conceding more than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.4.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for NAN's win chance, the blue ones for GRE's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| NAN goals | GRE 0 | GRE 1 | GRE 2 | GRE 3 | GRE 4 | GRE 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAN 0 | 9% | 8% | 5% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| NAN 1 | 11% | 13% | 7% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| NAN 2 | 9% | 9% | 5% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| NAN 3 | 4% | 4% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| NAN 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| NAN 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
NAN 44.7% · Draw 28.3% · GRE 27.0%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.4%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Nantes have the edge at 45% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
Nantes are favoured but the draw at 28% is too high to ignore — this doesn't feel like a walkover.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
NAN
3-4-3GRE
4-1-4-1Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
NAN scores +0.12 more per 90
Defences level on season average
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
NAN sit 3 places higher in the table