
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · MET 1.3 · BOU 1.0 · 2.3 total
MET's attack (1.30x the league average) against BOU's defence (0.71x, tighter than average) gives an expected-goals edge of 0.3.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for MET's win chance, the blue ones for BOU's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| MET goals | BOU 0 | BOU 1 | BOU 2 | BOU 3 | BOU 4 | BOU 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MET 0 | 11% | 9% | 5% | 2% | <1% | <1% |
| MET 1 | 12% | 14% | 7% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| MET 2 | 9% | 9% | 4% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| MET 3 | 4% | 4% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| MET 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| MET 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
MET 43.0% · Draw 29.3% · BOU 27.7%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.3%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Metz have the edge at 43% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
Metz are favoured but the draw at 29% is too high to ignore — this doesn't feel like a walkover.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
MET
4-2-3-1BOU
5-3-2Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
how each side performs at their ground
MET scores +0.75 more per 90
BOU concedes 0.41 fewer per 90