
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · HIB 1.3 · DUN 1.3 · 2.6 total
Expected goals are close (1.3 vs 1.3) — the model reads this as an evenly matched attack-defence balance.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for HIB's win chance, the blue ones for DUN's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| HIB goals | DUN 0 | DUN 1 | DUN 2 | DUN 3 | DUN 4 | DUN 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIB 0 | 9% | 9% | 6% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| HIB 1 | 9% | 14% | 8% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| HIB 2 | 6% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| HIB 3 | 3% | 3% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| HIB 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| HIB 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
HIB 35.5% · Draw 28.3% · DUN 36.2%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.4%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
This looks even — 28% draw probability with neither side above 36%.
The draw at 28% is the single most likely outcome — scoreline distribution keeps returning to 1-1.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
HIB
4-2-3-1DUN
4-4-2Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
Solid badge = vs. top-tier opponent
how each side performs at their ground
DUN scores +0.26 more per 90
DUN concedes 0.10 fewer per 90
discipline, stakes and what's on the horizon
DUN sit 5 places higher in the table
Photo: Pachiscool11, CC0 1.0