
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · LEG 1.0 · CDS 1.0 · 2.0 total
Expected goals are close (1.0 vs 1.0) — the model reads this as an evenly matched attack-defence balance.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for LEG's win chance, the blue ones for CDS's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| LEG goals | CDS 0 | CDS 1 | CDS 2 | CDS 3 | CDS 4 | CDS 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEG 0 | 15% | 13% | 7% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| LEG 1 | 13% | 14% | 7% | 2% | 1% | <1% |
| LEG 2 | 7% | 7% | 3% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| LEG 3 | 2% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| LEG 4 | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| LEG 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
LEG 32.7% · Draw 32.7% · CDS 34.6%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.1%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
This looks level with over 2.5 goals at 32% — open but no clear winner.
The draw at 33% is the single most likely outcome — scoreline distribution keeps returning to 0-0.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
Predicted XI released around an hour before kickoff
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
how each side performs at their ground
LEG scores +0.10 more per 90
CDS concedes 0.62 fewer per 90