
Cookies: one sign-in cookie. Analytics only if you accept. Cookie policy
Model is split — no outcome stands clear.
Expected goals · VIC 1.3 · CES 1.4 · 2.7 total
Expected goals are close (1.3 vs 1.4) — the model reads this as an evenly matched attack-defence balance.
Every square is one final score. Add up the green squares for VIC's win chance, the blue ones for CES's, and the grey diagonal for the draw. Model estimate, not odds.
| VIC goals | CES 0 | CES 1 | CES 2 | CES 3 | CES 4 | CES 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIC 0 | 8% | 9% | 7% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| VIC 1 | 8% | 13% | 9% | 4% | 1% | <1% |
| VIC 2 | 5% | 8% | 5% | 3% | 1% | <1% |
| VIC 3 | 2% | 3% | 2% | 1% | <1% | <1% |
| VIC 4 | 1% | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
| VIC 5 | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% | <1% |
VIC 32.6% · Draw 27.3% · CES 40.0%
Scores with 6+ goals for either side (0.5%) are counted in the totals but not drawn.
OneTouch call · statistical model, for interest not betting advice
Cesena have the edge at 40% — the likeliest outcome, not a certain one.
Cesena are favoured but the draw at 27% is too high to ignore — this doesn't feel like a walkover.
The model uses league form only — it doesn't weight head-to-head history, recent injuries, or tactical changes that may shift the balance.
predicted XI, manager & bench depth
Predicted line-up
recent results, streaks and prior meetings
how each side performs at their ground
VIC scores +0.12 more per 90
CES concedes 0.81 fewer per 90